Department of Education Betrays 200,000 Student Loan Borrowers
The Department of Education is trying to back out of the Sweet v. McMahon settlement, leaving 200,000 defrauded borrowers without promised loan forgiveness.
getoutofdebt.orgHere is what I can share right now about Sweet v. McMahon and its settlement timeline.
If you want, I can pull the latest official court filings or press statements to confirm any new rulings or negotiated extensions and provide a concise timeline with precise dates. Would you like me to fetch the most current documents or summaries from a specific source (e.g., the Project on Predatory Student Lending, court dockets, or a primary DOE filing)?
Note: I’ve cited the latest publicly available summaries and updates here to reflect the current status as of early 2026.[1][3][9]
The Department of Education is trying to back out of the Sweet v. McMahon settlement, leaving 200,000 defrauded borrowers without promised loan forgiveness.
getoutofdebt.orgHear the latest on the Sweet v. McMahon (formerly Sweet v. Cardona and Sweet v. DeVos) litigation and case updates.
www.ppsl.orgGet the latest information on challenges against the Department of Education’s processing of borrower defense claims.
www.ppsl.orgJustice Department Asks to Renege on Agreement Just Weeks Before Court-Ordered Deadline
www.ppsl.orgThe Education Department filed a last minute request to extend the time window to process student loan forgiveness applications, just days before a key deadline.
www.forbes.comThe borrower-defense settlement in Sweet v. McMahon (formerly Sweet v. Cardona and Sweet v. DeVos) continues to shape the Department of Education’s (ED) obligations to adjudicate borrower defense to repayment applications. A recent bench ruling materially affects the timeline for so-called “post-class” applicants. Under the settlement, borrowers fall into three […]
www.cullenllp.com