Federal Judge Dismisses DOJ Lawsuit Seeking Detailed Information About Rhode Island Voters
A federal judge in Rhode Island has dismissed the Trump administration's lawsuit demanding the state's unredacted voter rolls
www.usnews.comDirect answer: A federal judge dismissed the DOJ’s lawsuit seeking Rhode Island’s non-public voter data in mid-April 2026, ending that particular bid to obtain unredacted voter rolls. The decision sided with Rhode Island officials and civil rights groups, finding the DOJ lacked authority for a “fishing expedition” into private voter information. The case was part of a broader set of DOJ efforts nationwide that have faced setbacks in multiple states.
Key details and context:
What this means going forward:
If you’d like, I can pull the latest local Rhode Island 다시 updates from Rhode Island Secretary of State or court dockets, and summarize them with direct quotes.
A federal judge in Rhode Island has dismissed the Trump administration's lawsuit demanding the state's unredacted voter rolls
www.usnews.comA federal judge in Rhode Island has dismissed the Trump administration's lawsuit demanding the state's unredacted voter rolls KCBS All News 106.9FM and 740AM
www.audacy.comJudge rejects US Justice Department effort to obtain Rhode Island's voter data
www.investing.comRhode Island Secretary of State Gregg Amore said in September he would hand over the public voter list, but not the private data the DOJ was requesting
www.bostonglobe.comWASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. District Judge Mary S. McElroy today dismissed a lawsuit filed by the Department of Justice demanding sensitive voter data from
elias.lawLearn more here.
www.democracydocket.comA federal judge has dismissed a Trump administration lawsuit demanding that Rhode Island share detailed voter data with the federal government.
www.legalreader.comA federal judge in Rhode Island has dismissed the Trump administration's lawsuit demanding the state's unredacted voter rolls. U.S. District Court Judge Mary McElroy on Friday sided with Rhode Island election officials and civil rights advocates, stating federal law doesn't allow such a "fishing expedition." The Justice Department declined to comment. The DOJ claims it needs the data for election security, but officials argue the demand violates privacy laws and are concerned it will be used...
www.ajc.com